Apparently, there are many of us who shoot jpeg mostly. I even go so far and use the lower quality jpegs, as there is NO VISIBLE difference in prints made by professional Fuji printers in my lab.
I sometimes enlarge to A4 without a problem and I only have D30. So go figure. :) I guess everything in photography is subjective. I shoot some pictures with ISO1600 (with Zenit 16mm) on D30 and the pictures looked quite bad on a computer screen. Because I really liked one particular picture (http://www.e-fotografija.com/artman/publish/article_285.shtml, the one with the bite :)) I sent it to my lab and printed it to 13x19cm and the quality was the same as with Fuji Press 800 film (IMHO), that is noticeably better than it looked on screen. Regards, Miha. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > I shoot predominantly jpeg on my 10D, and have a > > problem in that no one has yet identified a print made from > RAW as opposed > > to one made from the jpeg sourced from the same image. > (Printer is an > >Epson 1270, paper is Pictorico.) > > Well, if that's a "problem", then let's have some more. > > Glad to hear someone else also has good results from .jpg. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
