----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lars Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: EOS 350D v 10D


> Supposedly much better the first E-TTL version,  which was
> admittedly bad.

That's not what Canon (UK) told me whan I complained about the pathetic
performance I suffered from the first  E-TTL !   They patronised me saying
that I didn't understand how it worked.  (But I could see 2 stops of
under-exposure.)

Cheers,

Malcolm Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm



*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to