----- Original Message -----
From: "Félix López de Maturana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 3:37 PM
>
Canon 14/2.8, which is quite large, extremely expensive and not that
good.
Not my experience. A outstanding lens -knowing his extreme field of view
and inherent constructive difficulties-
Felix and I discussed this some time ago and I must agree.
However, it is quite an old design and the results I've seen from a good
copy (there's the rub) of the Sigma 12-24 are better in some respects (e.g
CA).
But we are both talking FF, here, I believe.
IME, on my 10D a PTLens "de-fished" 15mm produces better results than the
14mm, aperture for aperture and is slightly wider.
So, for 1.6x cameras, with a fisheye and software you have two lenses in
one: a 24mm "partial" fisheye and a 23mm-ish rectilinear.
CraigZ
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
