Since I have been behaving exceptionally well I am pretty sure Santa is going to drop the requested stuff down the chimney. I have been a little lazy about sending my letter to the North Pole because of the dilemma I am in.
I am a proud owner of an EOS 20D and use it for portraits, kids sports and a few landscapes. I need your expertise to help resolve which lens out of EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM OR EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM will make more sense for me: * The 70-200mm (112-320mm for 20D) does not sound as useful as 28-300mm (45-480mm for 20D) * The F 2.8 of the 70-200 lens may be more useful than the F 3.5-5.6 of the 28-300 lens. * The 28-300mm costs $500 to $600 more. I have heard a lot more about the 70-200mm than the 28-300mm - does the 70-200 so much sharper resolution that it will beat 28-300 hands down ? The links and price for the lenses is given below. Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofocus Lens <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/234444-USA/Canon_7042A002_70_200m m_f_2_8L_IS_USM.html> Price: $1,699.00 Instant Rebate: -$125.00 After Rebate: $1,574.00 Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Autofocus Lens <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/319784-USA/Canon_9322A002_28_300m m_f_3_5_5_6L_IS_USM.html> Price: $2,199.00 Thanks for your help. Regards, Sarbjit Singh Design Technical Operations Phone: 313-805-7822 LVC STUDIO, BUILDING # 2, MEZZANINE - 2M-H27. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
