On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:18:55 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, we need to put some thoughts into this -- if we for example > start building packages that require the newer libvirt today then > users of CentOS 5.0 (5.1 is not released yet) and those still on RHEL > 5.0.x would run into dependency issues when using EPEL. We should try > hard to avoid that. That's why I suggested to keep "5.0" directories > around for some weeks months -- but the idea was not that welcomed > afaics... 5.0.x doesn't exist. 5.1.z will exist, for a period of time up to the release of 5.4 I think, or 5.5. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
