> FYI, for all my epel packages I use CentOS (yes, I'm an @redhat.com) Thats sound more encouraging from your side, i will re-consider CentOS and take a look.
> differences you see between RHEL and CentOS you need to report to CentOS > as I'm sure they'd be interested in fixing it. Thats why i was afraid... I dont want end up maintaining any CentOS too, but probably it was a strong preconception from my side about CentOS. Must confess never took a look at any CentOS untill now. > AFAIK there have been very > few if any issues supporting EPEL in CentOS as CentOS is one of EPEL's > target operating systems. If we're not compatable with CentOS we're doing > something wrong. See. > > > Well than i can renounce and be happy with Fedora. > > This sound strangly like a threat from someone looking to get a free RHEL > license.... Just saying. It can be not so free. Or i dont know what schema, i questioned the subject and got answer, however i didnt thinked it as an abuse or something like this, but probably thinking in principles than anyone can request licenses and it turn probably into a sort of abuse. Cristian. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
