On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:55:09 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:38:43PM -0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote: > >> ====================================================================== > >> The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > >> ====================================================================== > >> > >> Summary of broken packages (by owner): > >> > >> Matt_Domsch AT dell.com > >> dkms - 2.0.19.1-1.el4.noarch > > > >> dkms-2.0.19.1-1.el4.noarch requires kernel-devel > > > > Last time I looked, kernel-devel is provided by Red Hat in their > > packages, as well as CentOS. Is it somehow excluded from the package > > set for the purposes of this repoclosure?
Depends on how it is configured. If run for i386, the report is true, because kernel-devel is available for i586/i686 only (in the CentOS 4.6 repo at least). The arch here must be i686 when running repoclosure. > Given that some of my packages were complaining about missing glibc > I'd say that the script is broken and the results cannot be relied > upon. It isn't broken. It was misconfigured on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:51:25 +0000 (UTC) according to the diff that was sent to sysadmin-members. For ppc and x86_64 the RHEL repository URLs are bad. As why this doesn't create a fatal error in yum remains to be investigated. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
