On 06/20/2009 07:52 AM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > pe, 2009-06-19 kello 13:11 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen kirjoitti: >> I had looked at this a while ago. My strategy looked to be to create a >> moin15, moin16 etc that would replace the older versions (moin-1.5 >> etc) since upgrades from 1.5 to 1.8 were uhm painful (I know I did it >> a couple of times). > > This sounds like a good idea, but it would mean more work for us (which > isn't a reason to dismiss it, but it might take considerably more > time...) > > Were you planning on backporting security patches for 1.5 or just > releasing the current package as moin15?
Note: To me personally, if we aren't backporting fixes to moin15 I'd rather see it dropped and just go ahead and document all the pain we can for moving to moin-1.8. Others may differ (and there may be valid cases "I'm using moin on an intranet" and the like)... It's choosing between two bad situations. -Toshio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
