On 07/19/2009 04:11 AM, inode0 wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Jesse Keating<[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Jul 18, 2009, at 15:07, inode0 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> As far as a script helping goes it would only help if it were provided >>> by Red Hat has part of RHEL. Otherwise it would not be available >>> universally as not everyone uses any particular 3rd party repo. And if >>> they (Red Hat) would agree to such a thing, unlikely I think, it might >>> as well be part of rpm, like rpm -q >>> --where-the-heck-did-this-come-from package. >> >> Or perhaps a bug reporting URL field in each rpm. Accessable via rpm -qi or >> a targetted query. > > Correct. But while fixing the issue of identifying the source of an > rpm inside rpm is appealing in the long term, it isn't going to help > the world as it exists today. Such an RFE would probably take a couple > of years to get into RHEL and would not be likely to be backported.
Can you file it now, nevertheless? Rahul _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
