On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse Keating <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 12:55 -0600, Michael Stahnke wrote: >> >> I completely agree. I thought we did keep 1 version back, but perhaps >> I am wrong on that. >> +1 on making this an official stance for keeping at minimum 1 previous >> version. >> >> Is this difficult to change from a technical perspective? > > Yes, you'd need significant changes in mash to support this, or you'd > need to write a post-mash utility that merged the new tree and parts of > the old tree together, potentially re-making repodata. It is not a > simple/easy task. >
So is the feature that inode0 is seeing a side-effect of koji usage versus plague (eg it worked when we were using plague but it changed when we went to koji?) I am not looking to go back to plague.. but wanting to pin down why/when the change occurred. -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
