On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:40:24 -0600 (CST) Mike McGrath <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:01:58 +0530 > > Rakesh Pandit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello list, > > > > > > I would need approval for importing transifex 0.7.x for EPEL 5. > > > As per ticket > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1455 0.7.x > > > transifex is required for infrastruture update. > > > > Infrastructure has their own repo, so it could just go there. ;) > > > > Every time we do this though it feels like a failure. Yeah. ;( I fear our best will be to try and educate upstreams and see if they can take into consideration doing updates as a priority. As a side note, I think it still might be a good idea to maintain a file/wiki page listing each thing thats in the infrastructure repo and why it's there. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
