On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's a proposal: > > Let's make an alteration to our current policy to something of the > effect that "we do not ship any package that has an openly available > RPM/SRPM located in any child directory of > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ but we are unable to > verify that there will be no conflicts as not all channels are > published." > > Beyond that I don't think there is any realistic expectation of us to > know what we could potentially conflict with if the information is not > publicly available. > > -AdamM
"EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace packages in RHEL or layered products." to "EPEL is purely a complimentary add-on repository and does not replace packages in RHEL. [Package conflicts are determined by what is openly available from Red Hat's tree (currently located at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/) ] > -- > http://maxamillion.googlepages.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
