Once upon a time, Rich Megginson <[email protected]> said: > Perhaps we should have a "base" EPEL channel and "layered" channels on > top?
The problem with that is that you would need something like: epel-base: packages that don't conflict with any known RH channels epel-not-ds: packages that don't conflict with RH DS channel epel-not-sat: packages that don't conflict with RH Satellite channel ... I don't know how you'd manage that (especially if you had a server subscribed to multiple RH channels). -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
