On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:46:52PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:07:35 +0100 > > Till Maas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hiyas, > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:34:00PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > EPEL swimming in the RHEL channels (nirik, 21:23:24) > > > > ACTION: smooge will generate a list of packages that are not > > > > following our new current policy. (nirik, 22:03:43) ACTION: > > > > dgilmore or nirik will block them. (nirik, 22:04:12) > > > > > > is there now a new policy or will the currenty policy stay ? And what > > > does the policy say? > > > > Sorry, we should have spelled that out in the summary. > > > > EPEL packages must never conflict with packages in RHEL-AP. > > EPEL packages can conflict with packages in other RHEL channels. > > EPEL maintainers should be open to communication from RHEL maintainers > > and try and accommodate them by not shipping specific packages, or by > > adjusting the package in EPEL to better handle a conflicting package in > > a channel on a case by case basis. > > > > At least I think thats what we all agreed to? > > Comments/clarifications/etc? > > > > We need to word this up nicer, update the wiki, and send an email to > > the announce list. Anyone want to help with any of those parts? > > > > I know I should know what AP stands for but... what does AP stand for in > RHEL-AP? >
Advanced Platform? (Assuming this means including the Clustering channels and such) Ray _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
