On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Chris Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Once upon a time, Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> said: >> On Friday 12 March 2010, Chris Adams wrote: >> > This is similar to mrtg vs. perl-SNMP_Session; mrtg has its own private >> > copy of the SNMP_Session perl modules, but they are found by the >> > auto-provides (so the RPM lists them). Then mrtg is a shorter name than >> > perl-SNMP_Session, so a package requiring "perl(SNMP_Session)" gets a >> > broken install. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563619 > > Yeah, that's a dupe of my 4 month old bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532556 > > I looked at the RHEL 5.5 beta, but I didn't see a new mrtg package.
Is there something we can put in the spec files to tell RPM not to look at it? -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
