On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:35:09AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:30 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > With a package you have a lot more garbage to maintain - with just > > > adding the dep you can phase it out in an update and not have to add any > > > obsoletes or conflicts garbage. > > > > > This argument could be used for every compat package in Fedora as well, > > though. Why don't we ship the openssl compat package and the main openssl > > packages from a single srpm? > > B/c the openssl items are not on a horizon that is as a short as > 6months. > I don't understand this phrasing. Could you restate?
> This problem goes away when samba3x gets fixed. > > Yes, in RHEL-5.6 IIUC and it goes as planned. -Toshio
pgpj2uZ0fSjsR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
