On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:00:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I brought this up at the EPEL meeting today, but as we were running > out of time, I was asked to raise the issue by email on the list. > > Currently, the EPEL Steering Committee does not exist in any strict > form. It appears to be formed ad-hoc by those attending EPEL > meetings. > > In general, interest in the management of EPEL is fairly limited as > mentioned by smooge: "[W]e are also about 5 interested people and 95 > people who just like make packages" > > My real question is whether we all feel that this is a sufficient > form of governance for EPEL, or should we attempt to formalize a > steering committee similar to Fedora? > I'm satisfied with this atm as it seems that currently those who do the work are getting the opportunity to make decisions.
IMHO, if it turns out that many of those 95 packagers would like more input in the direction of EPEL but feel they can't because they aren't able to attend the meetings, then we need to look at something more formal. -Toshio
pgp2AKtDL7rMW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
