On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:40:00 +0200 > Mark Chappell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Oh and on my actions from the last meeting attached is the rough >> > status (package, owner, built or unbuilt) of the EPEL packages, note >> > I'm aware that some of these are red herrings, but the numbers >> > aren't looking brilliant... >> >> *cough* >> >> Attached > > How about we spam maintainers one more time and do something like: > > "We've noticed you haven't built your EPEL6 package(s) yet. > > Since we would like to see a nice thriving ecosystem of packages, we > would like to mass orphan packages in EL6 that have not yet been built. > Then, interested folks could pick them up and build and maintain them. > > If you intend to build, but just haven't had a chance yet, feel free to > re-take ownership of the packages or join back as co-maintainer." > > Or is that too harsh? > > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > I'd be fine with it, but I am direct and harsh :)
stahnma _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
