On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:38:42 -0700 > Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 09/16/2010 10:27 AM, Mark Chappell wrote: > > > On 16 September 2010 17:48, Orion Poplawski<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> Any progress on getting fftw into EL6? Thanks! > > >> > > >> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3916 > > > > > > I think we're still waiting to hear from Red Hat if there's going to > > > be a RHEL6 equivalent of the RHEL5 "productivity" channel that > > > provides the packages that are in the WorkStation build to the > > > Server build, we really want to minimise any fiddling we may have > > > to do post General Availability... > > > > Sorry to be a pest about this, but now that RHEL 6 has been announced > > do we know any more? I don't see a fftw src.rpm in 6Server, > > 6Workstation, 6Client, 6ComputeNode, or in > > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6/en/source/SRPMS/. > > Yeah, I don't see any of the 'optional' srpms in there... and now we > have 'server' 'workstation' and 'client'. ;( > > I'm not sure if thats intentional or some oversight, etc. >
the optional srpms are in there. I just confirmed a bunch of them with Karanbir - it looks like it was just a syncing thing. but they are definitely there now. -sv _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
