-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/15/2010 04:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > If not, I don't see any reason to wait, especially an arbitrary period > of time. Release it now. > > Some things may not be there at release time, but again, unless EPEL is > going to be held up for those packages, there's no point in waiting.
I think part of the reason is that non-RHT customers have no binaries in which to test their builds upon. Ballparking here, but I think not a small amount of EPEL packagers are CentOS (or other) users and not RHEL users. That said, I think it would be quite fair to grant each EPEL packager with a RHEL developer entitlement which could be used to test their builds upon. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzh0G4ACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVg0QCfV2cEVRY7BTNKOSylm6LgH6VV sJEAniX/rDvasjP/2MPnAVeZyBvjnfZJ =Rovs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
