On 12/01/11 09:16, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I think we should just go with a unless someone really is willing to > work on b. Well, I had a little attempt, just on x86_64, and was unable to get the existing build to rebuild. With what Kevin said (and lack of ppc64 and coding expertise), I think the exclude is going to be the most effective process.
I'll look back shortly, and if no one has better suggestion, I'll add the exclude ppc64 as Kevin suggested, so that my package can build. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
