On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:58:04 -0500 Fred Wittekind <[email protected]> wrote:
> So did you install the newest clamav package from the EPEL repo then > update it to the new package you are working on? Or test with a older > previously release EPEL package updated to the newest currently > released EPEL package? This was the currently available EPEL one upgraded to my package. > I noticed your virus database moved locations after the update, I > would be interested to know what the new spec file would do if you > did a update with it, from one version of a clamav package based on > your spec file, to a updated version based on the same spec file. > (virus database not moving locations). Yeah, probibly should move back to /var/lib/clamav. > I used Fedora 14 & Fedora 14 clamav packages for my tests (I think I > stated this in my previous msg), figuring that since the existing EPEL > package is based on the Fedora one, that it would be pretty close. My > production CentOS boxes are using packages based off the newest Fedora > clamav package. I'm lacking a non-production RHEL/CentOS 5 box for > testing. Ah, so this was a fedora14 clamav upgrading to a newer fedora 14 clamav? The current version in EPEL is based on the fedora one. Mine is not at all, it's based on the dag one, it's very different. > I do not know if the spec file you created will ever produce the > behavior I was able to produce on my Fedora box when it's updated or > not, but if can make sure the issue is addressed now (if it's > present), it's one less bug report later. Sure, good to get sorted. ;) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
