On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 09:38, Jaime Melis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I am part of the OpenNebula [1] team and we would like to include OpenNebula > in EPEL. OpenNebula is in the process of becoming part of all major linux > distributions. Our problem with the EPEL has been that we need the package > xmlrpc-c to build OpenNebula and as far as I know xmlrpc-c is not available > in EPEL. > Therefore I have some questions: > - Is there anyone interested in becoming maintainer of OpenNebula for EPEL?
I think the reverse question is also true, are you available to be a maintainer for Fedora or EPEL? For software like this, it is much better if upstream is working on doing this as they can fix issues there versus a long game of pass the bug. > - Is xmlrpc-c going to be included in EPEL 5? > - Is xmlrpc-c going to be included in EPEL 6? programs are included in EPEL when a maintainer wants to maintain it. We try to stay away from including software that we then have no one interested in fixing later. > - In case xmlrpc-c is going to be included in EPEL 6, is it possible to > start working on including OpenNebula for EPEL 6? > [1] http://opennebula.org > Thanks > Regards, > Jaime > > -- > Jaime Melis, Cloud Technology Engineer/Researcher > DSA Research Group: web http://dsa-research.org and blog > http://blog.dsa-research.org > OpenNebula Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing: > http://www.OpenNebula.org > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
