Hello, I'm preparing my own software source RPMs for inclusion into EPEL-5. My software is similar to fail2ban but it also includes a nice web interface.
While I'm distributing this software with my own commercial products I ship the software in two packages. One for the software and one for the javascript library that I use in the web interface(ExtJS/Sencha). I do that because I have other web interfaces using the same javascript library. I talked with wolfy on irc and I have a dilema about how to organize the package for the EPEL repository. Should I continue to have the javascript library as a separate package? Also if it is a separate package, what would be the appropriate place for the files? Since it is a library it should be under /usr/lib, but since it is only web related, maybe the better place would be under /var/www. In either case my application should have a symlink to the directory in order to work. Also if it is under /var/www wolfy mentioned that it would be best if it is not web accessible, what are your toughs about that? So guys, please give me some advice, I want to minimize the work of the reviewer once I file the package review request. -- Best regards, Marian Marinov
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
