On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 10:04 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote : > > > David, do you know if the MRG folks have issues with facter and puppet > > in EPEL? As I said, those packages have been in EPEL for years, so > > I'm not sure there's anything to be gained by trying to block them at > > this point. We're already way past MRG in terms of NVR's. But if > > there are ways we can help alleviate issues for MRG users, I'm game to > > try. > > I seriously hope MRG will be ignored here : No one using puppet today > will be interested in the old packages it ships, and as you mentioned in > another post, upstream is *very* active and many people are tracking > the releases very closely (me included).
Well, there's always is the possibility of doing various packaging magic that would allow parallel install or at least cause a package conflict which would prevent accidental upgrade. But as I mentioned in my previous email, not sure if there is much point in doing this for this particular case any more. -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +358-504-146348
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
