On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:37:49 +0530 Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 11:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This is not expected. ;( > > > > There should not be a newer one in epel. ;( > > > > I will try and track down whats going on and get that version > > removed. > > Would be very useful to have script check this. I have made this > mistake myself on more than one occasion and sometimes RHEL includes > packages that weren't there before and sometimes even based on the > EPEL package without the package maintainer in EPEL being aware of > this. A scripted report cc'ed to package maintainers would go a long > way towards avoiding such problems in the future Yeah, agreed. I've not had time to implement this, but it's on my list. It will need to run in infrastructure in order to be able to see all the packages we build against. ;( kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
