On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Steve Traylen wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 13, 2011, Toshio Kuratomi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was working on a python-pygments/python26-pygments bug today and found > > that the byte compilation of the packages was... wrong. Changing various > > setings to do with the automatic byte compilation of python modules to byte > > code, I could either get everything compiled with python-2.6 or everything > > compiled with python-2.4; I could not get the python26 subpackage compiled > > with python-2.6 and the python 2.4 portion compiled with python-2.4. > > > > You have to do the byte compiling fairly manually in this case of py26 in the > same package. > > I believe that Python_pbs is for instance correct but I can't verify myself at > moment. > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python-pbs.git;a=blob;f= > python-pbs.spec;h=441b3d7e5befce2144b54436cedfdb60588e1ce8;hb= > f1573df43d2ea04000f9c42b76fb0b4e4c5bb072 > Thanks, this looks a lot like what's present in pygments currently (IIRC, I believe you contributed that so it's no wonder they're similar :-). However, I verified that the rpms in the epel repo for python-pbs are correct whereas python-pygments is not so there must be some minor difference between the two. python-pbs is currently failing to build in el5 (unable to find the pbs library).
I looked at Jeffrey Ness's fix in parallel to this and once I found it worked and is simpler, I went with that. So I did not explore further. -Toshio
pgp7iMg67oqz0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
