On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:07, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:39:55 -0600 > Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi looks like we have packages which over-ride the Red Hat provided >> ones in epel-testing: >> >> >> libv4l i686 0.8.3-2.el6 >> epel-testing 108 k libv4l x86_64 >> 0.8.3-2.el6 epel-testing 110 k >> >> are both newer than the ones in RHEL-main and should not be pushed. >> to EPEL. > > Looks like this is a subpackage of v4l-utils > > Not sure if just that subpackage needs to go, or the entire v4l-utils, > but it does have an owner. ;)
Ah I wonder why I got an orphan for looking for libv4l. The v4l-utils requires libv4l so I don't think it can go into EPEL at 0.8.3 without some sort of repackaging. > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
