On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden <[email protected]> wrote: > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the > resulting package 1.x in name only.
I think this would be ok. > Thank you. > > Russell Golden > Fedora Project Contributor > [email protected] > (972) 836-7128 > -- > "We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will > add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your > culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile." > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
