On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:44:54 +0100 Karanbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 04:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Is there any check in place to prevent updates breaking the rule > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Policy_for_Conflicting_Packages > >> ? > > > > Nope. We have talked about setting something up, but it's not > > trivial to implement. ;( If you want to work on it, happy to help. > > Wonder what the challenges are... it should be mostly just a case of a > white/black list matching on ${name}. We already do this against > CentOS/EPEL for both src.rpm content and binary content in > i386/x86_64 ( and hopefully powerpc soon ) It likely will be easier with 6. On 5 it was unclear what of the many channels to check against. On 6 it's more clear what things we use and could check against. If someone wants to write up such a script, or if CentOS folks are willing to provide their script I could see about getting it running here. ;) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
