On 19 May 2012 10:15, Mathieu Bridon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 11:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Fri, 18 May 2012 17:18:40 +0800 >> Mathieu Bridon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Koji helpfully says it was built from the git commit 1d8afac... which >> > is not in the fedora/el6 branch, but in the branch leading to f14+. >> > >> > I'm confused, how is that possible? >> >> I'm as puzzled as you as to why it's the -2 version tho. ;( >> It shouldn't be... -1 is the one in git... > > I think the maintainer didn't do « fedpkg build » (or that would have > generated a build for the current branch) but instead use « koji build > dist-6E-epel git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/... »
It was a chain build, I think I simply managed to find an obscure bug in fedpkg. It wasn't deliberate, I was trying to get a lot of packages built for dependency chains. > It's still very annoying, for example: > - it's very confusing for someone looking at the repository Yeah, I've submitted a clean build > - it totally defeats the purpose of a potential FTBFS run (trying to > build something different from what is in the distribution) Actually in this case it doesn't, the only change was a version bump for a rebuild. But it had the *potential* for that. > - it makes life harder for downstream consumers of Fedora who rebuild > stuff out of our Git trees > - it's generally bad for any kind of (automatic) process based on our > Git trees Yeah, it was a mistake plain and simple. > Not sure what to do about it though, issuing an update just to > synchronize the repos with Git seems overkill, but leaving them out of > sync is not right. :( Yeah I've rebuilt the package, I'll push the bodhi update when 6.3 appears. Mark _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
