-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/23/2012 02:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The issue is that if EPEL pulls out core packages every time Red > Hat decides to offer a sub-channel of supported, then there is no > need for EPEL since it will get gutted regularly. At this point we > are looking at 1/3->1/2 of EPEL having to be removed because > packages require or buildrequire items that are included in > layered products that would no longer be available to build > against. Which leads me to my first statement, that the usability > of EPEL to a layered user is much less than a base OS user. Sorry if I've missed this answered elsewhere, but why don't the RHEL layered products use e.g. Puppet from EPEL instead of bundling it? - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) http://TheOpenSourceWay.org @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) | gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPvdf42ZIOBq0ODEERApOHAJ9PZqOMHRmJKUB9yqZx9rQTLlw03ACg2ocu RCRk6DDwTxxwyJ7wE13xNMI= =OMes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
