On 02/12/2013 04:37 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:28 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
That means I did not save it to the 'right place' so I could move it between
systems to make building easier. I REALLY need to set up a local repo with
these odds and ends I seem to collect. This is what I used to do years ago,
and got out of the habbit as more and more of the specials I needed became
standard offerings.
thanks for straightening me out.
Hi Robert,
Alternatively, you could always become the EPEL package maintainer.
Then you can let Fedora's release engineering manage the repo for you
:)
Since the last release of gftp was in 2008 I would recommend switching to
e.g. filezilla which is available from EPEL.
that would require teaching this old dog new tricks, and right now I
have enough new tricks to deal with. Perhaps around summertime ;)
While the EPEL package doesn't seem to be maintained anymore either at least
upstream is still maintaining
the project and current builds are available for Fedora and can potentially be
rebuilt for EL6.
Which has lots of other tools. Actually I ONLY use gftp for a GUI SCP
interface (or whatever it is doing under the covers when you select SSH!).
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
