On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:48:18AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds, I think). I was thinking about this > > more recently in the context of "things we need for Fedora.next in the > > coming year or so". The new repo might target both EL and Fedora and provide > > alternative versions maintained on, say, a 3-year lifecycle. > Yeah -- I think that something like this could be good. A repo with > a 3 year lifecycle may make sense for RHEL more than Fedora as the > basesystem we're building on is still active at the end of that period.
I'm thinking here about SCLs (or possibly other stack/env tech) that might target current supported Fedora but have a longer lifecyle of its own (with best-effort compatibility for three years). I keep coming back to this idea because it's what people ask me for. :) -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mat...@fedoraproject.org> _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
