On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Stahnke <stah...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> ><snip lots of stuff> > > > Smooge thanks for the write-up. > > Great points are being brought up by all parties here. > > I think I'm +1 on a second repo that moves faster and can be incompatible > with the right type of announce-list. (maybe even put the uri for that list > in the .repo file or something). It also might be acceptable to allow > builds against SCL, or bundle libs if we want real speed and end-user > convenience. Obviously there's more than a little hand-waving there, so > don't consider that anything more than a spitball idea. > > I like the idea of pairing with the CentOS folks for that, but I don't > really know where to start there. This ecosystem has lots of information if > you know exactly where to look. Otherwise, navigating it can be tricky. > > As for EPEL meetings, if we could have them again, I'd really try to be a > part of it. Timing is crazy for a world-wide crew like this one. > > I'm completely -1 on /opt/blah for EPEL. > Thanks Michael for saving me writing an email -- I'm +1 on everything you said here. Regarding working with CentOS -- I know Jim's watching this list closely and seems he plans to be at the proposed meeting this week, so it should be easy to get some dialogue going. -Jeff
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
