On 5 September 2014 08:27, Jeff Sheltren <j...@tag1consulting.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> - EpSCO governance. >> - Lifetime of initial committee (9 months?) >> >> This is fine for me. Somewhere in the 6-12 month range seems reasonable. > I am going to take your initial request for putting an end date for this emergency committee but change the end date to March 31 2015. I think that will put a good 6 months to our current work and hopefully get it to a state where the next committee can focus on regular package problems. > > >> - >> - Replacement of any exiting members (replacement by formal vote, >> etc). >> >> Vote of existing committee members, or vote of the wider EPEL dev/user > community? I'm fine with having it done with a committee vote. > > >> >> - >> - Size of committee (4 members? 5 members?) >> >> I was in favor of 4 members when it was brought up in the last meeting. > However, it occurs to me that all of the people volunteered/nominated are > RedHat employees (correct me if I'm wrong?). So I'd prefer to have one > more member -- a non-RH person. This is in no way a comment on you all who > I trust and believe want to do best by the community, but others may not > see this the same way. > > At this point there isn't anyone who isn't a RH employee who has said they could make regular meetings and would like to sit on a steering committee to do a lot of grundge work looking through policies and dealing with people. If there is such a person I would be happy to look at them as a 5th member (or if one of the 4 want to leave). -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
