On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > > However, there are and will be cases where somebody would like to > > create a non-SCL RPM depended on a software collection, which is > > something not solved properly yet and the solution might be quite > > different from collection to collection. > > This makes me kind of scared. I'm all for the first sort of software > collection, but I think limiting this helps constrain the problem set. > > (Although I don't think such packages should be limited from, eg, Fedora > Playground.) > I'm not sure how/if this matters on Fedora, but for EL, being able to use devtoolset would be a big gain and would allow for inclusion of packages that require a newer compiler than gcc 4.4 that comes with RHEL 6 ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/2013-September/008737.html ).
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
