On 21 December 2014 at 14:23, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> wrote:
> Hi, > > due to a bug in the script to identify long-time orphaned packages, no > packages that were already retired in Rawhide were reported in the > reports from the previous months. I now fixed the script, so the next > reports will still show a lot of packages that are orphaned for more > than six weeks now. Since they are retired already in Rawhide, I guess > it is very unlikely that they will be picked up. However since there > were not enough proper announcements for the packages, I will not retire > them for now, but they will probably be retired soon, if nobody picks > them up. > > Also I noticed that some packages might have been retired due to > broken dependencies, because they are noarch but depend on packages that > do not exist in i386. For example oz depended on python-libguestfs. To > avoid this, use ExclusiveArch to make sure that noarch packages will > only be shipped my mash for the appropriate archs. > > Thanks for letting everyone know. I will say we will delete any unclaimed of these around the second week of January. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
