On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Dave Johansen wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Kevin Fenzi > > <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:00:35 -0700 > >> Dave Johansen <davejohan...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Is that really true? The Qt 5 package in EPEL 6 has been updated > >> > several times and I don't recall ever seeing an > >> > email/announcement/etc. > >> > >> Were the upgrades incompatible? You have to manually intervene? > > > Honestly, on the machines I'm using, I installed 5.2 and haven't updated > > since 5.3 was released because I didn't want to rebuild and re-test all > of > > my stuff, but my understanding of the following is that the upgrades are > > not completely compatible: > > http://upstream.rosalinux.ru/versions/qt.html > > Fwiw, Qt upstream takes both api and abi stability pretty seriously > (official public interfaces). If you experience any concrete > incompatibilities after upgrading, it's arguably a bug worth fixing. > Yes, but doesn't the change in the name of the .so require a rebuild?
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
