On 17 March 2015 at 20:08, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:34:10 -0600 > Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This was on the packaging list but effects EPEL. Any suggestions? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Thomas Moschny <thomas.mosc...@gmail.com> > > Date: 17 March 2015 at 10:59 > > Subject: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6 > > To: Fedora Packaging list <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > > > > > I have a package that can be build on all Fedora branches and on EPEL > > 6 and 7 with the same spec file. It uses > > > > Basically, I copy the license file into %_pkgdocdir like for any other > documentation on systems where %_licensedir isn't defined. >
I'm using this really nice trick (it was posted by someone here in the list in the past months): http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bacula.git/tree/bacula.spec#n583 I'm building the same SPEC file on all RHEL/CentOS/Fedora releases. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
