On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 10:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com >> <mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>> wrote: >> >> On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski >> <or...@cora.nwra.com <mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com> >> <mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com <mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com>>> wrote: >> >> On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: >> >> I just noticed that the version of cmake that comes >> with RHEL 6 is >> currently 2.8.12.2 and the EPEL has a cmake28 package >> that is at >> version >> 2.8.11.2. I believe that RHEL 6 originally shipped with >> cmake >> 2.6 and >> updated in a later point release, but I have two >> questions: >> 1) Is the cmake28 a duplicate and need to be removed? >> >> >> Yes. >> >> >> Ok. Is this already being worked on? Or does a bugzilla need to be >> created for it? >> >> >> A quick search: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Acmake28&list_id=3417355 >> >> turns up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159351 >> >> There is some question as to whether or not it is worth the pain to >> retire. I suppose you could also consider it pulling things away >> from EPEL users. If it is kept, it probably should be updated at >> least. >> >> >> Would it be possible to create a Bugzilla and request that a virtual >> provide for cmake28 be added to the cmake package in RHEL? I believe >> that would allow the package in EPEL to be retired without requiring >> changes to existing .spec files. I'm guessing that a cmake28 symlink >> might be needed as well, but it still seems possible and a solution that >> shouldn't have too much headache. >> > > Sure, anything is possible :). Although I don't see what the big deal > about changing the EPEL packages would be. If anything, it would just > bring them back in line with the Fedora branches. > My concern would just be the added effort of maintaining both of them and it falling behind like has already happened here.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
