On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:41:54 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 January 2016 at 13:48, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Despite the confusion, my feeling is that we want the newer
> > versions. People who want to run python3 are willing to live more
> > on the bleeding edge.  What I've observed is that they want newer
> > versions of libraries as well.  Building packages that nobody wants
> > to use because they are too old isn't that helpful to those who
> > want to use the system packages for their development.  For us
> > packagers, getting applications to run on python3 frequently needs
> > newer versions of supporting libraries due to bugfixes for python3
> > going into those libraries.  Attempting to pin the python34
> > versions to the versions that ship with RHEL or in EPEL as the
> > python2 version will quickly become a hindrance to us in those
> > efforts as well.  
> 
> +1 from me for adopting newer package versions as baseline in the
> python3X stacks.

+1 from me too. 

Also, now that 35 is out, do we want to switch epel7 to python35 before
we go building out things much more?

kevin

Attachment: pgpoEkONladIa.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to