On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wo...@nobugconsulting.ro> wrote:
> On 01/29/2016 04:41 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> On 01/28/2016 12:02 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>>> After some fun hacking and many, many complete rebuilds, I've built and >>>> submitted for testing a version of epel-rpm-macros for EPEL5 which >>>> removes the need for several pieces of RPM junk which have annoyed me >>>> for many years now. >>>> >>>> These macros do the following, entirely by "magic" without requiring the >>>> use of any boilerplate or line noise: >>>> >>>> *) Provide a BuildRoot: tag if one is not specified. (The recommend >>>> value >>>> from the EPEL guidelines is used.) >>>> >>>> *) Provide Group: tags for the main package and any subpackages which >>>> don't >>>> have one. The value used is "Unspecified". >>>> >>>> *) Automatically provide a %clean section. >>>> >>>> *) Automatically delete the %buildroot at the beginning of %install. >>>> >>>> *) Allow the use of %license in the %files section (maps to %doc as >>>> usual). >>>> >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Any ETA on rpmlint EL5 update according to this change? >>> >>> >> This gets dicey because rpmlint is a RHEL package, not EPEL. >> >> It cannot be found in > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Client/en/os/SRPMS/ so no, > it's not a RHEL package. > It has always been in EPEL > > > wolfy, former maintainer of rpmlint for EL5 and EL6 > For EL5, yes it's an EPEL package, but for EL6 and EL7, it's in the base OS: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Workstation/en/os/SRPMS/rpmlint-0.94-3.1.el6.src.rpm https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!rpmlint/refs!heads!c7
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
