28.4.2016, 10.03, Jamie Nguyen kirjoitti:
On 28/04/16 06:28, Anssi Johansson wrote:
This change to the plans was discussed briefly in yesterday's EPEL
Steering Committee meeting, and we're OK with updating straight to 1.10.x.
I believe there are a number of people who are interested in HTTP/2
support, so please do go on with this plan.
Excellent, thanks.
As a heads up, you may run into issues with missing ALPN support in
OpenSSL. Some pointers:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276310#c6
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,261880,261880#msg-261880
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327548
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2111901 (paywalled, no idea)
This may require an update to OpenSSL from RH.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
