On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Dave Johansen <davejohan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Tom Callaway <tcall...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Recently, I've been participating in some discussion as to how to enable
>> C++11 support for EPEL builds. Specifically, R (and its large universe
>> of addons in CRAN) would benefit significantly from C++11 support.
>>
>> After much discussion, it seems like the only sane way to do this is to
>> use the Red Hat Developer Toolset (for el6 and el7). It is my
>> understanding that all RHEL customers (and CentOS users) should be able
>> to enable this repository without restrictions.
>>
>> I'd like to propose that we enable the Developer Toolset repo in EPEL
>> and allow packages to depend on it. Thoughts?
>
>
> Previously, the big hold up was that it was at least partially behind a
> paywall, but now that it's open and headed up by a SIG, I don't see any
> reason why we shouldn't start benefit from using it. It might be nice to
> have some rules or at least recommendations on which version to use and
> there will need to be a policy when versions are EOLed, but maybe just an
> automated set of rebuilds would be sufficient.

Probably the best way to do this would be to create a "wrapper"
package that would point to the latest version and provide a macro for
setting up the environment so that the spec uses the Developer Toolset
compiler for building the software instead of the system one. Maybe
"devtoolset-toolchain" or something like that?

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to