On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, Dave Love wrote: > Obviously I can do that and set up a repo for use with mock, but you > surely don't expect all package maintainers to do that.
when it is testing a Beta in a new Major, I do not feel that is an unreasonable expectation There is also a .repo file which you may find useful at the URL mentioned in a moment > > I see later in the thread the suggestion to file a boog > > > > done: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657930 > What's that reporting, as it's not visible? That is an unexpected behaviour, new since the Bugzilla reqork in the last few days, and with no obvious way to 'unlock' it on my part as Reporter ;( Anyone wanting to view it send me, off list, their RH bugzilla account email address, and mention of this bug nuber, and I will add as a 'cc' --- there is nothing 'secret' there ;) I requested access to sources , and bug assignee Josh was kind enough to point to: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rhel-8-beta/ which are populated down sub links: 49M add-ons/ha/source/Packages/ 49M add-ons/rs/source/Packages/ 192M add-ons/rt/source/Packages/ 8.9G appstream/source/Packages/ 1.4G baseos/source/Packages/ -- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
