On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 08:26:32AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Case: RHEL delivers a non-modular P package. There is no S stream of
> > a M module. Can I add a new M module with a new S stream that will contain
> > a modular P package? I guess it will be allowed. Can I make the stream
> > default? I guess that won't be allowed.
> >
> 
> I would agree with your assessment.
> 
Thank you for the prompt response. I have yet another peculiar corner case of
this one, that I is actually very prominent for me:

We have plenty of Perl packages in RHEL. Most of them are not modularized,
thus they are compatible only with Perl 5.26, a default perl:5.26 stream.
I feel there will be a demand for providing their modularized variants in EPEL
so that users can use them even with non-default perl.

All that can be implemented by adding a new module. This is not a problem. The
problem is that the module will an second-class citizen compating to a module
with net new package due to missing the default stream. The reasong for
banning the default is that the EPEL modular package would mask the
non-modular RHEL package.

Let's I have a theoretcal way how to build that module so thet a context for
perl:5.26 will be an empty, no RPM package. Then making the stream default
would not violate the no-replacement rule.

If a user used perl:5.26, yum would install the non-modular package from RHEL
because there won't by any modular package masking it. If a user enabled 
a different perl stream, yum would install the modular package from EPEL.

Would you accept this solution?

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to