On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:29 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:36 PM Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > My main job is working with Fedora Infrastructure, and we are trying to > > work out how to handle: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8558 > > > > The problem is that various tools filter what packages can be branched into > > Fedora see that libssh2 was in a module that RHEL shipped in 8.0 but it is > > no longer in the release with 8.1. > > > > Do we need to make libssh2 a module? > > Should we allow libssh2 be branched as a 'bare' package in EPEL proper? > > Other? > > > > Since libssh2 is being dropped from RHEL, I think we should just > permit it as a regular package in EPEL proper. That maximizes its > usefulness to everyone. >
I second that. I don't think it matters if it was in a module or not. If it is no longer in RHEL8, then it should be permitted as a regular EPEL8 package. Troy _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
