On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:18 AM Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 09:46, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm sure it was announced but I've been very busy lately but while trying >> to build a package for EPEL 8 I noticed that two builds (arches) failed for >> missing dependencies but two did not. >> >> I see that there are a number of arches not originally part of RHEL 8, >> which is fine, but when the arches were added shouldn't all of the affected >> packages been rebuilt to add the new arches? >> >> > I don't know what you are seeing to say this. The arches which were > initially there were x86_64, ppc64le, s390x and aarch64. I don't know of > any arches added after that and those have been in el8 since day 1. > My original build of OpenImageIO only has x86_64 and ppc64le which I believe are the two RHEL 8 arches, correct? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1347855 I have never used ExcludeArch in OpenImageIO... Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
