On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 4:44:58 PM CET Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:30:21AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Honestly I don't know how to deal with regular EPEL-8 development after
> > this. EPEL is going to add an epel-next which they would ask for additional
> > targets in mock for. However that does not fix building against the regular
> > EPEL-8 target. I expect it will depend on what programs come up for
> > development in the coming year and if the new -devel RHEL UBI images can be
> > used for mock.
> 
> Or just the no-cost RHEL developer subscription? It seems like this is a
> good use case for that, if it could be made easy enough that it isn't
> painful for EPEL packagers.

That would be sort of good for Copr (we now can not support EPEL s390x for
example because there's no CentOS s390x).

Could we use the devel subscriptions (on copr builders) for building epel-*
targets against RHEL?  Or could we get some special subscription for Copr
purposes?  Yes, so far we (copr) build EPEL against CentOS+EPEL (ditto users
locally, with mock-core-configs.rpm).

Pavel


_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to